Re: The Brooklyn Animal Foster Network, the ones that set up on Saturdays in front of John Jay HS @7th Ave at 5th St.
As I walked by last Monday (Columbus Day), their pit bull lunged at me and bit my thigh. Their first response was suggesting it was my fault because I had a bag of groceries in my arm. They also said that was their sweetest dog. They delayed getting the person in charge (who was across the street), hoping I would just walk away. After I persisted they finally brought over the boss. She offered NO apology whatsoever, but tried to get me to sign a medical waiver! WTF??
I love dogs as much as the next guy. But I was astonished how these people were more concerned about themselves than my fang scarred ass! Keep your children an extra leash-length away from these dogs when you walk by!
kirby Regular
Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Posts: 55
Sat Oct 18, 08 11:01 am EST
Two Saturdays ago I saw one of their pit bulls attack a man. Luckily they pulled the dog off the man's leg before the dog broke skin.
Smitty Frequent Flier
Joined: 04 Oct 2006 Posts: 207 Location: Greenwood Heights
Sat Oct 18, 08 11:03 am EST
yikes...guess they don't do behavioral testing.
Hamilton Minister of Propaganda
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 1874
Sat Oct 18, 08 11:24 am EST
911 should have been called and the dog taken away before it mauls a child.
AccordingToTalia Newbie
Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Posts: 15 Location: Park Slope
Sat Oct 18, 08 1:57 pm EST
My friend was so touched by the dogs in the portable dog adoption center in Park Slope that she took one home with her last year, fell in love with him, then had her heart broken when he had to be put down after he attacked her and her neighbor's child.
Many of those dogs have been abandoned because they have severe behavioral problems. I am ALL FOR pet adoption, but prospective adopting parents need to beware that the dogs they're getting often times have special needs and are not the best behaved!
brooklynpotter ceramme ceramma danna
Joined: 11 May 2006 Posts: 3996 Location: near the square that's a circle
Sat Oct 18, 08 2:01 pm EST
Nepenthean, have you spoken with them since? did you sign that waiver? i hate getting those animal people in trouble because they save animals, but they need to be proactive when shit happens. _________________ what would you tell me, if i could hear you speaking?--t.r.
Peanuts Crabby Native
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 Posts: 501
Sat Oct 18, 08 4:49 pm EST
I hope you didn't sign the waiver.
When I adopted one of my cats from a rescuer, one of her rescued dogs bit me very badly as I was leaving. She apologized and assured me of no rabies. (This woman is anti-profit and rescues so my animals I wouldn't have sent her my medical bills which were covered by insurance anyway). She also told me she bought the dog to the ASPCA (at that time it was a kill shelter) and strongly recommended it be put down.
These people sound very irresponsible...ALL rescued animals need to be checked for behavioral issues - some can be rehabilitated but unfortunately some should not be put up for adoption. _________________ Peanuts
eggcream Carneviento Devotee
Joined: 29 May 2006 Posts: 1237 Location: PS Bklyn
Sat Oct 18, 08 4:50 pm EST
That sucks. I hope the bite wasn't too bad. We just walked by there. They are across from John Jay today. Lots of cats in the freezing cold huddled together. Saw the dog in question. They had another cute small white dog.
We adopted a cat from them over a year ago. Never got the papers they promised. But we are happy with the cat and it worked out well. She's neurotic but cute.
modsquad Carneviento Devotee
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Posts: 1464
Sat Oct 18, 08 6:16 pm EST
I'm familiar with the people who run the adopt a cat at the Petco in Union Square (Earth angels?). They tried to rescue several cats left by a deli on 17th st. Ended up chasing them into the subway station. I have to say without a doubt all of those people are pretty much like the animals they rescue, basically abandoned by their families by their own choice or the family's. They are just as feral as the cats and dogs they pawn off.
Toadette W train hater
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 386 Location: South
Sat Oct 18, 08 6:36 pm EST
modsquad wrote:
I have to say without a doubt all of those people are pretty much like the animals they rescue, basically abandoned by their families by their own choice or the family's. They are just as feral as the cats and dogs they pawn off.
I hope you are just referring to the Earth Angels crew and not to animal rescue groups in general (and even still, that seems a bit harsh). There are many perfectly good rescue organizations out there run by responsible and genuinely caring people (and I'll add in "socialized" to counter the "feral"). They do the community a great service in saving animals from death and helping find them homes.
I just adopted a great dog (former pound puppy) from Waggytail Rescue. I met her foster mother, who was wonderful. You can tell my dog was in a very loving and caring home before I got her. I also had some contact with Bideawee and Posh Pets Rescue; while I didn't wind up getting a dog from either of them, all the people I dealt with seemed very together.
I don't doubt that there are some animal rescue groups out there who aren't as responsible as others, but please don't write them all off because of a bad experience you have had. These people do a service to the community. Those groups who need to tighten up their ships should be helped, not written off as nut jobs.
My apologies also to the OP who suffered the bite. Hopefully the group will learn from their mistakes and be more careful about which dogs they bring to adoption events...or that the proper authorities will be notified to give them the "guidance" they need.
Last edited by Toadette on Sun Oct 19, 08 3:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
lbleier Newbie
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 43 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Last edited by lbleier on Tue Oct 21, 08 8:03 am; edited 2 times in total
Mookie Wilson Regular
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 131
Sun Oct 19, 08 9:18 am EST
i see no inconsistency in his post. his use of the phrase "fang scarred ass" strikes me not as an attempt to describe precisely where he was bitten, but rather to make a little bit of light of an unpleasant situation. if your puppy tore his jeans, then i hardly think he "extorted" you by asking that you pay for them.
tajmb Regular
Joined: 15 Apr 2008 Posts: 124
Sun Oct 19, 08 10:09 am EST
I have no information about the dog biting or bitingS as the various posts seem to indicate. I do have to back up Eggcream though. I walked by yesterday 10/19 too. At about noon it was cold outside, very breezy. I doubt it was 65 as you claim. I looked in the cages and saaw several different kittens/cats that were literally shivering. I wasn't sure if it was the cold or just fear. One of them (mostly black with some white maybe) had a runny nose. Maybe that was the cold or maybe the kitty is just sick.
Some of the cages were draped with towels, but not all. My honest reaction at the time as a long time cat owner/lover was that they needed more protection. I thought that before coming home yesterday and reading about all this.
bebevonbernstein Newbie
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Posts: 23
Sun Oct 19, 08 10:40 am EST
To BAFN: I doubt very seriously the dog in question "knew" it was on some euthanasia list.
Having read over the BAFN materials, it's very clear that you believe that animals can do no wrong. A (shelter) dog owner myself, I recognized the woman with the pit yesterday as someone with whom I've had run-ins in the park, due to her insistence that an aggressive pit needed to be "socialized" at the risk of other dogs in the area.
I'm sure you'll disagree, Laurie, but you *do* have a responsibility to the public if you're going to have dogs on the street or in the park. If they don't know how to be "appropriate" in either setting, they have no business being there. You can blame humans all you want, but by having these dogs out where they can behave "inappropriately," you do more harm than good to your own cause.
There are many, many non-aggressive dogs in shelters that need homes -- and just as many of those are euthanized because you want to take on the cause of those dogs that don't fit in with our city society.
Flexichick Windsor Terrorist
Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 9623
Sun Oct 19, 08 10:45 am EST
I am fostering two kittens from Kensignton Kitties right now. They were also out on 7th Avenue and moved all of the cats onto their little bus because they were shivering and it was too cold to be outside.
I wasn't there (obviously), so can't speak to where the poster was bitten, but $35 does not cover the cost of a pair of jeans these days.
I support animal shelters because for the most part they do great work. That said, if an animal is too unpredictable or not well socialized enough to be in public, they don't belong there. That dog probably needs some fostering until it is calm enough to be around people and eventually be adopted. _________________ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball!
Lo Kee Bruce Ratner's Love Child
Joined: 17 Jul 2008 Posts: 602 Location: HOT BIRD
Sun Oct 19, 08 11:00 am EST
lbleier wrote:
SIR,WHERE DID THE DOG BITE YOU? First paragraph you say thigh, last paragraph you say ass. Get your lies straight before you defame BAFN a group you know nothing about but lie so outrightly with so little shame!
The dog in question a 7 month old puppy excited to be out of his cage and out of the shelter where he was on the euthanasia list DID lunge at this man and grabbed him by his jeans. Only as an inappropriate gesture to get him to say hello. No blood, no bite no harm.
Yeah, whatever. LAWSUIT! LAWSUIT! LAWSUIT!
Mod edit: Fixed your quote tags _________________ giggity giggity
Nepenthean Newbie
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 17
Sun Oct 19, 08 11:40 am EST
lbleier wrote:
SIR,WHERE DID THE DOG BITE YOU? First paragraph you say thigh, last paragraph you say ass. Get your lies straight before you defame BAFN a group you know nothing about but lie so outrightly with so little shame!
If this is your best defense of what happened, then it speaks loudly of your attitude about your dogs biting passersby - precisely the point of my post.
lbleier wrote:
The dog in question ... DID lunge at this man and grabbed him by his jeans.
This is laughable. How do dogs "grab" things? With their teeth!
lbleier wrote:
Only as an inappropriate gesture to get him to say hello.
When dogs bite people, isn't that all they're doing, just trying to "say hello?"
lbleier wrote:
No blood, no bite no harm.
So your official position is if the dog's bite did not punture the skin deep enough to draw blood, it's okay AND you can state that the bite didn't even take place.
lbleier wrote:
I did appear 15 minutes later when called about the matter.
Why would you take fifteen minutes to just cross the street when one of your animals has just bitten a passerby?
lbleier wrote:
We gave him $35 to buy a new pair of jeans and I thought we left on good terms.
as you hoped I wouldn't file a complaint with the Dept. of Health and the ASPCA.
lbleier wrote:
Then I get a google alert and read this. Proof: in the first sentence the man says "he bit my thigh". In the last though he mentions "my fang scarred ass!"
As Mookie Wilson's post explains my use of the term "fang-scarred ass," I was bitten on the thigh, as you saw with your own eyes, where the dog tore my jeans open at the seam, before his teeth reached my skin. I've got the photos to prove it. You want to talk about lies?:
lbleier wrote:
As you screamed about suing us and extorted $35 from our little group people shook their heads at your insane pettiness and I calmed them down.
First of all there was no screaming. Secondly, I never made any such threat to sue anyone. Your very first words to me were an offer to compensate me for my jeans, so there was no extortion. And by even using that word, you suggest that you would feel no obligation to reimburse me. My anger about this incident has much less to do with the dog biting me, but more about how you and your organization handled it. You never once apologized. And that is my reason for posting the incident here.
superjonbot Regular
Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 154
Sun Oct 19, 08 1:36 pm EST
I need a new pair of jeans. Where was that dog located?
Hamilton Minister of Propaganda
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 1874
Sun Oct 19, 08 3:55 pm EST
superjonbot wrote:
I need a new pair of jeans. Where was that dog located?
**************************
when last seen he was hanging off Nepentaeans butt
5x5 two kids, no strollers...
Joined: 08 Aug 2008 Posts: 95
Sun Oct 19, 08 4:49 pm EST
lbleier wrote:
Really, why lie? We have adopted out hundreds of animals in front of John Jay and posts like yours are just so dangerous to the well being of hundreds more.
Actually, I think posts like yours are far more dangerous than his. Thanks for "setting the record straight."
petsitter07 Newbie
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 Posts: 17 Location: brooklyn
Sun Oct 19, 08 7:08 pm EST
If you know how to handle a dog it would not bite you, and would not have to be put down.
I can’t believe a Vet would kill a dog before the dog was checked out by a trainer.
petsitter07 Newbie
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 Posts: 17 Location: brooklyn
Sun Oct 19, 08 8:25 pm EST
It’s not the dogs that cause harm, it’s the people.
Everyone that has the adoption events are trying to save the animals from being put to death.
Mougar Carneviento Devotee
Joined: 30 Aug 2008 Posts: 1247
Sun Oct 19, 08 8:31 pm EST
petsitter07 wrote:
It’s not the dogs that cause harm, it’s the people.
Right, if dogs were left on their own they would never attack humans. I mean, who's ever heard of a wild dog attack?
The Chipster Irregular
Joined: 15 Oct 2006 Posts: 672
Sun Oct 19, 08 9:25 pm EST
Holy Crap! After reading the letter by their "director", I am apalled. That woman is CRAZY!! You can't hide all that bitterness and misanthropy under the guise of being a dog lover Laurie. Seriously. Disgusted. _________________ Ask a burning question, get a burning answer.
Hamilton Minister of Propaganda
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 1874
Sun Oct 19, 08 9:35 pm EST
petsitter07 wrote:
It’s not the dogs that cause harm, it’s the people.
****************************
True, i'm so tired of those man bites dog headlines, but fortunately in almost every case the man is put down.
Laddie Din Newbie
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
Mon Oct 20, 08 11:48 am EST
I know I'm going to be pounced on... These people obviously do good work but I have seen two instances in which they appear to be a bit unstable, as the e-mail from "Laurie" suggests. Last spring I saw a dog lunge at a passerby and the response of the people in charge was to blame the victim. "You shouldn't have gone behind him!" Is "Laurie" licensed? So many small children walk past that school on weekends... I'm not convinced these people have their safety in mind. But I know in saying that I'll be accused of being an animal-hater or something.
jf22561 Native NYer
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Posts: 166
Mon Oct 20, 08 12:02 pm EST
I think what it comes down to is that some rescues are more responsible than others. This particular rescue sounds shaky - not all rescues are like that. Some rescues feel more of a responsibility in terms of what types of animals they put up for adoption, what type of homes they would like for their animals, how to present the animals, etc., etc. It's called using good judgement and it doesn't sound like this particular group uses it.
BrooklynGigCenter Insider
Joined: 07 Feb 2008 Posts: 343
Mon Oct 20, 08 12:06 pm EST
I was passing this location this past summer, and I saw several cats baking in the sun, and obviously miserable from the heat. I asked the adoption people to please move their cages back a few feet so that they'd at least be in the shade, but they gave me such a freakin' hard time about it, it turned into a huge argument. I was wondering what their actual concern was about the health and welfare of the animals, and considering the posts above about shivering kitties, I sense a trend.
And considering the hysterical email from lbleier, I am getting a better sense of this operation.
BTW, this contrasts starkly with the adoption effort that takes place every weekend on 7th near the Key Food. Those people seem to take much better care of the animals than the ones in front of JJHS.
There should be some kind of rules/regulations/laws regarding these efforts. I really appreciate that people want to find loving homes for these animals, but making them suffer during the process is just as cruel as putting them down.
Nepenthean Newbie
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 17
Mon Oct 20, 08 12:15 pm EST
Laddie Din wrote:
I know I'm going to be pounced on... These people obviously do good work but I have seen two instances in which they appear to be a bit unstable, as the e-mail from "Laurie" suggests. Last spring I saw a dog lunge at a passerby and the response of the people in charge was to blame the victim. "You shouldn't have gone behind him!" Is "Laurie" licensed? So many small children walk past that school on weekends... I'm not convinced these people have their safety in mind. But I know in saying that I'll be accused of being an animal-hater or something.
You'll only get pounced on if you walk by their dogs.
whynot_31 Former Lurker
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 5681 Location: Prospect Heights
Mon Oct 20, 08 12:28 pm EST
there is no licensing for Laurie. Rescue groups are completely unregulated. Most don't even have non-profit status.
They are driven by the belief that no dog should ever be put down.
Given the problems with supply (too many dogs looking for a home) and demand (not enough homes looking for a dog) ...some dogs will end up having to be put down.
Their inability to accept this fact, likely prohibits them from focusing on offering the most adoptable dogs to the public. So, they try to get even the meanest dogs adopted, which likely plays a role in this incident.
...nobody likes to see a dog be put down, but until people start spaying their dogs it has to happen. ...if you tell me I'm a dog hater, I'll have my dog lick you.
Last edited by whynot_31 on Mon Oct 20, 08 12:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Flexichick Windsor Terrorist
Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 9623
Mon Oct 20, 08 12:33 pm EST
BrooklynGigCenter wrote:
BTW, this contrasts starkly with the adoption effort that takes place every weekend on 7th near the Key Food. Those people seem to take much better care of the animals than the ones in front of JJHS.
There should be some kind of rules/regulations/laws regarding these efforts. I really appreciate that people want to find loving homes for these animals, but making them suffer during the process is just as cruel as putting them down.
The group you are referring to is Kensignton Kitties. They are fabulous and I have two teeny babies in my house now being plumped up for adoption.
stacey Beyond Karma
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Posts: 3105 Location: Underhill Ave.
Mon Oct 20, 08 12:52 pm EST
Flexichick wrote:
The group you are referring to is Kensignton Kitties. They are fabulous and I have two teeny babies in my house now being plumped up for adoption.
And your big babies allow this?
Flexichick Windsor Terrorist
Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 9623
Mon Oct 20, 08 1:12 pm EST
stacey wrote:
Flexichick wrote:
The group you are referring to is Kensignton Kitties. They are fabulous and I have two teeny babies in my house now being plumped up for adoption.
And your big babies allow this?
The big babies are not allowed in the office where the munchkins are isolated. There was some under the door attempts at touching, but then my big babies kinda went "eh. whatever" and all is normal again.
I'll post picture later. They're adorable and will be adoptable shortly
metalnyc None Louder
Joined: 21 Jul 2007 Posts: 133
Mon Oct 20, 08 1:29 pm EST
petsitter07 wrote:
It’s not the dogs that cause harm, it’s the people.
it's my second amendment right to carry a loaded pitbull.
filmlover44 Funk Soul Sister
Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 1185 Location: No Man's/Woman's Land
Mon Oct 20, 08 2:26 pm EST
petsitter07 wrote:
It’s not the dogs that cause harm, it’s the people.
Everyone that has the adoption events are trying to save the animals from being put to death.
Are you nuts? One thing that drives me batty are people who humanize animals, like someone I know who adopted a German Shepherd who happened to be pretty ill and left it alone in her apartment with her bunny rabbits and their open cage in the living room.
You can imagine the hilarity that ensued when the German Shepherd got better.
If you don't understand dogs you have no business owning one or rescuing them or adopting them out, and that goes triple for "working" dogs. _________________ Ok, now I'm crazy. Another goal achieved.
filmlover44 Funk Soul Sister
Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 1185 Location: No Man's/Woman's Land
Mon Oct 20, 08 2:28 pm EST
whynot_31 wrote:
there is no licensing for Laurie. Rescue groups are completely unregulated. Most don't even have non-profit status.
They are driven by the belief that no dog should ever be put down.
Given the problems with supply (too many dogs looking for a home) and demand (not enough homes looking for a dog) ...some dogs will end up having to be put down.
Their inability to accept this fact, likely prohibits them from focusing on offering the most adoptable dogs to the public. So, they try to get even the meanest dogs adopted, which likely plays a role in this incident.
...nobody likes to see a dog be put down, but until people start spaying their dogs it has to happen. ...if you tell me I'm a dog hater, I'll have my dog lick you.
Sounds as though the ASPCA should be called if they are letting dogs bite people and are keeping cats in inhumane conditions. I've never witnessed any of this myself but if it's true, then something should be done about it. _________________ Ok, now I'm crazy. Another goal achieved.
whynot_31 Former Lurker
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 5681 Location: Prospect Heights
Mon Oct 20, 08 2:52 pm EST
The ASPCA is called on these groups on a regular basis. When you hear of the ASPCA taking in a large number of dogs and cats at once, it is often because the owner operates under the following logic: No, I can't take care of all of these cats/dogs, but it is better than them being put down.
They convince themselves that the animals have some chance of being rehabilitated and adopted. They convince themselves that the city is evil, etc.
I'm convinced that the groups attract a fringe element, one that is desperate to save animals ...in the worst case scenario they are willing to lie to get an animal adopted, under the logic that the adoption fee will then allow them to rescue more animals.
I am going to get so much email stating that not all rescue groups are like this ....let me say up front "not all rescue groups are like this".
CourtneyBleier Newbie
Joined: 20 Oct 2008 Posts: 10
Mon Oct 20, 08 3:50 pm EST
Ok. This has to be settled.
I am the girl that was holding the pit bull that bit you, wherever you say he did. Just to clarify, i was sitting up against the fence with the pit on a 1 foot leash. You walked RIGHT infront of us with a bag of food, with no intention of stopping. We NEVER said it was your fault. We said "thats most likely why he bit you". Clearly you're neurotic because you cant even tell the story correctly. How can you say we "stalled" getting the instructor hoping you would walk away. ARE YOU IN OUR HEADS? DID WE SAY WE WANTED YOU TO WALK AWAY? How dare you put words in our mouths! My aunt was GETTING FOOD. We called her ASAP for you! So stop your lying, and get over it. Youre very rude, and cold-hearted. To take money that was DONATED to us, is so insensitive i cant even tell you. You say you love dogs as much as the next guy, so then why did you take money from our donation bucket?
We never said it was our "sweetest dog". We said she was sweet. I caught you looking at me kissing and getting kissed and playing with the dog by Laurie's car, RIGHT AFTER the "attack". She smelled food, and you walked right infront of her. It is NO ONES fault, we NEVER pointed a finger. Youre stating that we told you it was your own fault, well you are either mistaken or dont remember the situation correctly.
Please dont try to make this sound worse than it really is, your pants were bit, the dog never broke skin. You werent even bleeding. And i am not trying to intentionally make light of the situation, but it really, and truly was NOT a big deal. The dog is a puppy, and puppies bite. YOURE FINE.
[/b]
booklaw pompous asset
Joined: 02 Nov 2007 Posts: 1025 Location: 7th Ave and 2nd Street
Mon Oct 20, 08 4:08 pm EST
You are a public menace, and you and your colleagues should be arrested for exposing the public to dangerous animals. Puppies who bite hard enough to tear fabric should be muzzled, in cages, or just put down.
The fact that money was donated to you does not insulate it or you from damages incurred by dangerous animals in your care.
I love dogs, in spite of the fact that I nearly lost my thumb to a dog bite many years ago. I still carry a prominent scar.
That bite was due to my own stupidity in getting in between two dogs doing their best to kill one another, i.e. trying to stop the fight so as to protect my friend's dog.
In this instance your puppy bit someone doing nothing more terrible than walking down the street. That person could just as easily have been a three year old child holding an ice cream cone.
The puppy's bite was not "no one's fault". It was your fault, for creating a dangerous situation by allowing an aggressive puppy to be within biting reach of passers-by.
The fact that you love dogs does not justify exposing people to the risk of being bit.
Last edited by booklaw on Mon Oct 20, 08 4:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Anastasia Beaverhausen hates you
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Posts: 3309
Mon Oct 20, 08 4:10 pm EST
Well, that's settled. Between the two of you (Laurie and Courtney), I will NEVER volunteer for BAFN and will send you an email shortly to make sure I'm removed from your email list. _________________ Babies aren't meat! They're not even people!
sweet tea Cooler Ham
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Posts: 4960 Location: the jewish
Mon Oct 20, 08 4:11 pm EST
MOD NOTE
ENOUGH.
find a way to disagree without resorting to name-calling.
i'm talking to both sides here.
_________________ Bumping ancient threads with bot-like bullshit
RBG Local
Joined: 31 Jan 2006 Posts: 286
Mon Oct 20, 08 4:12 pm EST
I adopted a mean little Yorkie from a reputable rescue group. He's nice, but he bites sometimes.
BrooklynGigCenter Insider
Joined: 07 Feb 2008 Posts: 343
Mon Oct 20, 08 4:23 pm EST
sweet tea wrote:
MOD NOTE
ENOUGH.
find a way to disagree without resorting to name-calling.
i'm talking to both sides here.
Damn, this was getting good.....
eggcream Carneviento Devotee
Joined: 29 May 2006 Posts: 1237 Location: PS Bklyn
Mon Oct 20, 08 5:10 pm EST
Loose the attitude. I see you skipped over the part where I said we adopted one of your cats.
And no, it was this past Saturday, see where I wrote "we just walked by there, that wouldn't mean two weeks ago" and it was in the 60's. Hence the reason you were probably ACROSS the street from John Jay, where there is less room, trying to get some sun. The cats were huddled together 2-3 in a cage with some towels on top. I guess it makes them more adoptable. After your posts here I'll never recommend anyone to your organization.
AND TO YOU EGGCREAM WHO WROTE:
"You just walked by there and the cats were freezing cold huddled in the freezing cold?" Was that two weeks ago when it topped 78 or last week when it was 65?
YOU WROTE:
That sucks. I hope the bite wasn't too bad. We just walked by there. They are across from John Jay today. Lots of cats in the freezing cold huddled together. Saw the dog in question. They had another cute small white dog.
LongTimeSloper Hi there
Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 2423
Mon Oct 20, 08 5:33 pm EST
So, in your logic, if someone walks by a dog with a bag of groceries, then the dog will just naturally bite them-huh? What messed up logic! I have walked by tons of dogs while carrying groceries and never been bitten-ever! Including my own dogs! The fact that this dog bit someone just because they walked by with a bag of groceries is seriously messed up and it is someone's fault. your fault and your associations fault for having a dog out there that would do that! The police should have been called immediately!
As for this person taking your money-well, yeah, your animal damaged a possession of his-why shouldn't he take money from you? if my dog did that to someone, I would offer them money!
I can't count the number of times I have walked by your group and dropped money in or played with a dog or cat, that will end immediately and the word will be passed on. And not because I believe this stranger's word so much, I don't know him from Adam. but, the way the people from this group have come on here and spoken is appalling!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum