Brooklyniancommunity archive · read-onlyContact

How many 5-year-olds could you take in a fight?

carnivore
carnivore
edited November -1 in The Lounge / Random Stuff
http://www.howmanyfiveyearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/

According to this, I can take 30! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Comments

  • shishkab
    shishkab
    i could only take on 18. could it be because i am older and fatter than you, or are you just. more. E-vil?
  • carnivore
    carnivore
    yes. :twisted:
  • armchair_warrior
    armchair_warrior
    You could take on 32 five year old kids in a fight.
  • MOD
    MOD
    22

    I'm not afraid to fight dirty!
  • littlegal
    littlegal
    Only 20. But the children I work with are younger so I could probably take on more of them...Kidding.
  • armchair_warrior
    armchair_warrior
    you guys need to fight more dirty with them little bastards!
  • apollonia666
    apollonia666
    Only 12.

    I'm fucking doomed.
  • sweet tea
    sweet tea
    just 18, but i have short, stumpy arms.
  • kvonankum
    kvonankum
    28. I'm not afraid to fight dirty :-)
  • pitu
    pitu
    I could take on 30 five year old kids in a fight.
    Martial arts experience . . .
    :twisted:

    I pictured them as Children Of The Corn to get rid of the morality/cuteness factor.
  • whyfi
    whyfi
    31 according to the site... but I think that I could do better.
  • lilbangladesh
    lilbangladesh
    20 for me. I'm willing to fight dirty if necessary, but I'm not too steady on my feet. Especially with the vertigo I've been having all weekend.

    But still, 36-55 is a WIDE age range and you could be in any state of health during those years, from "healthy athlete" to "about to keel over any minute".
  • drano
    drano
    26. I'd only fight hard enough to win.
  • carnivore
    carnivore
    Drano wrote: 26. I'd only fight hard enough to win.
    And therein lies your downfall, my friend. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: