Guess who is going to post next.

I am not stone nor rock nor MichaelKeys.

I imagine WhyFi will be next.

You imagine wrong!!!!! :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


pensodyssey next.

NO!!

Alafairnadia next.

yes! I mean, me!

right, Q?

Nyet.

MK?

playing the gnarls barkley video as i type this O:)
pitu?

Not exactly. But maybe pitu is next...

Mamacita wrote: MK, now that I no longer Rock, can you enlighten us on how it feels to rock all the time?

Tiring, Mama. But you always rock this board.

Now where is the good Dr?

i think he is waiting until we get closer to the 600th post so he can turn over the page for us.

what do you think, sweet tea?

Not sweet tea, but it is plausible. However, I think the good dr has bowed out of this thread. Only the evil dr remains! :twisted:

Right, alafairnadia?

Ah-ha! How right you are, Carnivore! It is I, Evil Doctor, at your service!

For instance, epidemiological data is often presented in a misleading manner. For instance, if exposure to chemical A increases 2-fold your likelihood of acquiring cancer B, does it really make any difference to you if your odds of acquiring cancer B in the absence of exposure to chemical A were 1 in 10 million? Not really. It would represent a jump from 250 cases per year in this country without exposure, to 500 with (again, assuming the effect is real). On the other hand, if the incidence is already 1 in 1000 and there is a doubling, that's an increase from 250,000 per year to 500,000 in this country. Clearly the latter result is the more relevant to your and the public's health.

Too heady for you? I am an Evil Doctor of many talents. How about the following topic, instead...

Modern jurisprudence and philosophy of law is dominated today primarily by Western academics. The ideas of the Western legal tradition have become so pervasive throughout the world that it is tempting to see them as universal. Historically, however, many philosophers from other traditions have discussed the same questions, from Islamic scholars to the ancient Greeks.

I am, as always, your evil servant. Ah-ha!!

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

good one ... can we have your doggy back?

right carny? we like the doggy avatar!

EVIL DRJAY wrote:

For instance, epidemiological data is often presented in a misleading manner. For instance, if exposure to chemical A increases 2-fold your likelihood of acquiring cancer B, does it really make any difference to you if your odds of acquiring cancer B in the absence of exposure to chemical A were 1 in 10 million?

i can tell you're evil -- non-evil doctorj would never begin two sentences in a row with "for instance".

right, shishkab?

Shishkab seems to be on break....but I'll agree; "for instance" is suspect.

Speaking of evil twins, though....remember how on Star Trek, the evil twins wore goatees? Kinda like Q's old avatar?

Quijibo?

Q ain't here. but I'm wandering around low income housing and/or rehab joints trying to get raped and mugged. wish me luck.

right sweet tea?

don't forget to wear your iPod so we have something to blame, alafair
correcto, Carnivoire?

damn right Hipster!
:wink
Kidding!!!: :P
Right Evil Dr. J?

I think we'll have to settle for Evil Lee Ho!
Come on brother, you're up . . .

sheesh! who let that evil doctor in here? jeez, this place is falling apart.

sorry i wasn't playing much today -- i was at Westminster tonight.

hey Alafair, how's that mugging going?

Fun! I watched a little of Westminster on teevee . . . them hunters were preeeeety. They have the individual breed judging on video on the website this year!
doggies!
shish next!

Nope.

However, I just got home from work and am going to bed now. I expect this thread to be on page 7 when I wake up.

Right, Mamacita? :twisted:

I'm no one's mami, and I'm glad about that today - the tykes would get knocked over by the wind.

right pitu?

no pitu here. those videos are awesome!
aren't they shishkab?

seven more posts! seven more posts!
right alafairnadia? right mama? right shish? right Q? right whyfi? right pitu?
go! go! go!

RIGHT!
right alafairnadia? right mama? right shish? right Q? right whyfi?
go! go! go!

Okay, you guys are down to five now...

Q, you gonna take this to four?

cuatro!
shishkab!!!!

three!!!

pitu???

Two.

ONE! I'm locking this thread. *click*