This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Yo, who is this chick???? - Page 2 — Brooklynian

Yo, who is this chick????

2»

Comments

  • sweet tea
    sweet tea
    okay, i know i'll get shit for this, but...

    it's called objectification. it's gross. it's demeaning. yes, to women in general. yes, i know it's "guy talk". yes, i am still offended, which will no doubt be a source of hilarity to some.

    i'm going out now, though. with my hot girlfriend.
  • lo kee
    lo kee
    sweet tea wrote: okay, i know i'll get shit for this, but...

    it's called objectification. it's gross. it's demeaning. yes, to women in general. yes, i know it's "guy talk". yes, i am still offended, which will no doubt be a source of hilarity to some.

    i'm going out now, though. with my hot girlfriend.
    Does she ever let you out all by yourself?
  • whynot_31
    whynot_31
    we still haven't solved the mystery of who this woman is. This was our original quest.

    Sweet teas problem may be with the photographer, or maybe the mods who posted the picture, or maybe with woman for her misguided attempt to capitulate to the larger societal norms.

    ...I think her fornicate-ability remains unquestioned by everyone who has commented. ...her true identity however remains unknown.
  • lo kee
    lo kee
    This is crossing over into internet stalking but as long as your intentions are chivalrous (and chivalry includes licking chilled gelatin or pureed tubers out of the space between a person's gluteus maximus), then I'm ok with it.
  • superman
    superman
    Lo Kee wrote: This is crossing over into internet stalking but as long as your intentions are chivalrous (and chivalry includes licking chilled gelatin or pureed tubers out of the space between a person's gluteus maximus), then I'm ok with it.
    It crossed the line into stalking at...

    "Yo, who is this chick????"
  • sweet tea
    sweet tea
    Lo Kee wrote:

    Does she ever let you out all by yourself?
    sorry, but this insult (i assume) doesn't seem to mean anything in this context.
  • apollonia666
    apollonia666
    Ick.

    Don't your knuckles get sore when you drag them on the ground so much?
  • lo kee
    lo kee
    sweet tea wrote: [quote=Lo Kee]

    Does she ever let you out all by yourself?
    sorry, but this insult (i assume) doesn't seem to mean anything in this context.

    If I were to be any more direct you would scold me in a PM and threaten suspension, like when I had the gall to state the obvious fact that Jah is a troll.
  • doctorj
    doctorj
    sweet tea wrote: okay, i know i'll get shit for this, but...

    it's called objectification. it's gross. it's demeaning. yes, to women in general. yes, i know it's "guy talk". yes, i am still offended, which will no doubt be a source of hilarity to some.
    The only thing worse than "guy talk" seems to be "girl talk"... guys seem to limit themselves to the skin-deep instant visual stimulus = instant sexual arousal/disgust nexus, mostly grow out of it by their late 20s, and eventually learn that it's demeaning and really poor form in mixed company.

    (just musing because I was at a party the other day where the 30-something girls seemed to have forgotten there was a straight-ish guy present).
  • whynot_31
    whynot_31
    doctorj wrote: [

    (just musing because I was at a party the other day where the 30-something girls seemed to have forgotten there was a straight-ish guy present).
    Chicklynian isn't too different. ...I've only been told, of course :shock:
  • garfunky
    garfunky
    sweet tea wrote: i am so sure even one of you guys is as good looking as that woman is. so. sure.

    that said -- you don't think it's just the teesiest bit sleezy and gross to be discussing how "fuckable" someone is online? she does actually exist, you know, and may even know how to operate something as complicated as the internet.
    I agree with you.
    but
    Many residents seem to have a case of terminal stupidity.
    cant change em all, but you can smack the shit out of the ones in reach ;0

    or at least posture enough that they remember they are in brooklyn

    not kansas.
  • whatchuwant
    whatchuwant
    whynot_31 wrote: [quote=doctorj][

    (just musing because I was at a party the other day where the 30-something girls seemed to have forgotten there was a straight-ish guy present).
    Chicklynian isn't too different. ...I've only been told, of course :shock:

    Well, as a matter of fact- there's a brand new WACK PEEN posted in Chicklynian. Come on in- the water's fine! :thumleft: :safe:

    ....and yes, I agree that sometimes (peh- who am I kidding) A LOT of the time, chick talk is way worse than guy talk. Or maybe I just hang with some really funny chicks....both gay AND straight, I might add. In fact, the lesbians have brought conversations to new heights for me. :D/
  • whynot_31
    whynot_31
    I prefer to wack peen in private ...but if you look, you'll find I've posted there before.

    KWACing and WACK PEEN, two things I try to do as little in public as possible.

    I wouldn't want to attract Victor.... not that there is anything wrong with attracting Victor.
  • spiritinthesky
    spiritinthesky
    Well done, funny video as well. Waht would we do without You Tube.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In

Categories