This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Falling Prices? — Brooklynian

Falling Prices?

prospectus
edited November -1 in Prospect Heights
Are prices for apartments going to fall? How much? Here's an interesting measure, according to the New York Times today:
One reliable proxy of housing values — the ratio of home prices to rents — indicates that in many cities prices are still too high relative to historical norms.

In Miami, for instance, home prices are about 22 times annual rents, according to analysis by Moody’s Economy.com. The average figure for the last 20 years is just 15 times annual rents. The difference between those two numbers suggests that a home valued at $500,000 today might be worth only $341,000 based on the long-term relationship between prices and rents.
What's an average rent? My wife and I went hunting for a one-bedroom rental this summer in Prospect Heights and Park Slope. Most of the listings we liked for one-bedrooms were around $2,000 a month. The annual rent for one of those would be $24,000. Times that by 15 and you get $360,000...

I figure that's about $50,000 to $100,000 less than the current price of an average one-bedroom. Change is gonna come.

Comments

  • You should not use Miami's rental/purchase price factors in NYC. NYC's rents are skewed higher due to rent regulation. Rent regulation imposes costs and additional risks to investor landlords which require a premium in the rental price. Added to this, the type of rent regulation in NYC discourages investment in the under $2000 per month sector of the market, so there are far fewer properties available than would be the case if rent regulation more evenly balanced consumer protections for tenants and property rights of landlords.

    Laws in most other states and cities are not as heavily weighted in favor of tenants as they are in NYC, therefore the risks of being an investor landlord in Miami are much lower, consequently many more investors enter all segments of that rental market. With more property available, vacancies tend to be higher, rents lower, and the quality of housing tends to be higher. Typically in Miami you would get a modern, well kept 1 bedroom apartment with a washer, a dryer and a parking space in the South Beach area for under $1000 a month. Try getting that in an equivalent area of NYC for under $4000. In Miami the landlord will probably give you some kind of sweetener to sign the lease. In NYC you will have to pay a broker 12% - 15% of the annual rent when you sign the lease.

    Unfortunately, it's basically the law of supply and demand. Oppressive rent regulations such as we have in NYC severely discourage private investment in regulated properties.
  • bohuma: I agree with you that rent regulation causes NYC's rents to be skewed higher and spaces in worse condition. Doesn't that then imply that the fair value for buying the aforementioned 1bdr would be even less than $360,000?
  • The price of rental apartment that is subject to rent regulation will normally be lower than a the price of a rental apartment not subject to rent regulation. In this case prospectus is looking at an owner occupied apartment. Rent regulation in fact skews all aspects of the real estate market, as does the political attitude. In markets like Miami, Chicago and Dallas/Fort Worth, many condo buildings contain a fairly high proportion of rental apartments, and investors may buy one apartment in a condo building and rent it out. This typically does not occur in NYC because small investors take a look at NYC rent regulation and think "It's less risky to invest elsewhere".

    NYC residential buildings tend to be either rental or owner occupied condo/coop. NYC condo and co-op boards are vary wary of encouraging or permitting a significant number of rental units, possibly out of fear that those apartments will become regulated and therefore create a lot of hassles for the board. The same does not occur in other cities and it quite common for a significant portion of a condo building to be occupied by tenants rather than unit owners.

    A further twist to the market is the antipathy many NYers display for the development of new high density housing. I have actually seen articles on the web suggesting that the large tracts of derelict warehouses and factories along the East River in Queens be preserved and somehow provided at low cost to manufacturers or artists or whatever, anything but demolished and turned into modern mid-rise housing. In addition, most new high density housing projects have to include a percentage of so called "affordable housing" if they are to get approved. The cost of providing this housing is borne by the buyers of the market rate housing.

    There is a whole conglomeration of regulation of rental and owner-occupied regulation that unnecessarily adds to the costs of owning or investing in NYC real estate. Rent regulation is but one part.

    I am a great believer in minimizing regulation in this area. There needs to be consumer protections, and building standards, but they should not be oppressive. I believe that he current regulation profits politicians, very large landlords, those old time NYers who have rent stabilized apartments and screws everyone else.
  • bohuma wrote: You should not use Miami's rental/purchase price factors in NYC. NYC's rents are skewed higher due to rent regulation.
    I've heard real estate experts apply this formula nationwide, and even though New York is crazy I still think it'll work here.

    I purposely didn't consider the "average" rent in Brooklyn. Rent controlled apartments can be dirt cheap, and I'll never get one, and new construction apartments, like AvalonBay's high-rise on Flatbush, are so wildly expensive I'll never afford one of those either.

    I purposely only considered the typical rental and for-sale listings I see when I, and apartment shoppers like me, visit a real estate office.

    The point of the formula is to compare the cost of renting to the cost of owning. It just so happens the most expensive apartment a landlord would rent to me based on the monthly cost and my income, according to my rental broker, is $1,800 a month. The most expensive co-op apartment I could buy and be approved by a bank for a mortgage is roughly $360,000. The monthly cost of owning the $360,000 coop would be higher than renting the $1,800 apartment, but not crazily higher, especially after you work in the mortgage interest tax break.

    An intelligent renter is probably not going to drastically increase his or her monthly housing cost to buy an apartment that's about the same as the place they already live in, unless they think they're going to make a ton of money when they sell it. That kind of thinking, treating a home as an investment, not a place to live, is one of the things that's inflated housing prices here.

    For-sale prices here are out of whack.
  • bohuma: Again I agree with you that rent regulation causes rents to be out of whack, and you're probably right about owner-occupier ratios and the distortions of regulation and opposition to mid/high-density development. But you didn't answer my question: if the structure of the market here is out of whack, what do you think fair or equilibrium ratio in is in NYC as opposed to the ca. 15 long-term average for the rest of the country? Two answers if you like, one for regulated renting vs. owning, and one for deregulated renting vs. owning?
  • prospectus wrote:
    An intelligent renter is probably not going to drastically increase his or her monthly housing cost to buy an apartment that's about the same as the place they already live in, unless they think they're going to make a ton of money when they sell it. That kind of thinking, treating a home as an investment, not a place to live, is one of the things that's inflated housing prices here.

    For-sale prices here are out of whack.
    I agree, at current interest rates. The formula I applied when I bought (and recommend trying) is that you work out the total carrying cost of buying (including tax and common charges) and subtract the principal repayments and tax-break on the interest. When it's roughly equal to your rent for roughly the same place, the price is right. Then, what you are essentially doing is foregoing the opportunity and interest on your 20% deposit, in favor of owning a place outright and having your housing costs plummet in 30 years' time. (taxes and common charges increase along the way, but so does rent, and after 10 years or so you'd expect things to swing in more favor of the owner). In our case, the ratio we bought at to meet those conditions was 21, which is high, but only because we locked a few years back at the historically lowest rate. As rates rise, the ratio has to fall in order to decide go/no-go which explains why the long-term average is closer to 15.

    Also, after 3 years owning, assuming little to no capital appreciation whereas rents in the area have definitely risen, we're down to a ratio of about 16 and falling; before long it'll cost more to sell and go back to renting than to stay put.
  • on WINS today they said housing prices fell 5% in Brooklyn from last year.
  • I guess I have a different perspective on owning versus renting. Having lived all but the last four years in deregulated housing markets, and having been forced into the "free market" apartments here (i.e. legal rent over $2000) I've always considered rent money to be dead money because I view rentals as temporary quarters until I can buy something permanent. Having said that, if as a renter, you have a guarantee of lease renewal at a predictable increase in rent, you might consider that less temporary. I still like the idea of being able to paint the walls and hang a picture without asking permission, and knowing the fact that what I am paying for housing ends up paying a dividend in the end.

    I think that when comparing ownership costs to rental, the costs you really need to focus on are the interest on the mortgage (not the total mortgage payment), maintenance charges and possibly heating charges. The part of the mortgage payment that decreases the outstanding principal should be viewed as savings. You really need to compare like with like.

    Personally, I will pay a premium for the satisfaction of knowing its my place.
  • MeredithB wrote: on WINS today they said housing prices fell 5% in Brooklyn from last year.
    Yes, according to Brown Harris. Corcoran's out today saying prices _rose_ 5% in the quarter (and +6% on per sq foot basis). Meh. Who to believe? Oh wait, they are both brokers...I'd go with neither.
  • bohuma wrote: I've always considered rent money to be dead money because I view rentals as temporary quarters until I can buy something permanent.
    The rent money is dead money, but so is the deposit, which could be otherwise invested, including securing your retirement. Much of a muchness.
    bohuma wrote:
    I think that when comparing ownership costs to rental, the costs you really need to focus on are the interest on the mortgage (not the total mortgage payment), maintenance charges and possibly heating charges. The part of the mortgage payment that decreases the outstanding principal should be viewed as savings. You really need to compare like with like.
    That's pretty much what I was saying (though for apartments which are what most of us live in round here, it's not heating charges, it's common charges / assessments and taxes). The correct buy/rent go/no-go ratio varies with the interest rate.

    I haven't run the numbers lately in Prospect Heights, for e.g. renting an older 2bdr vs. buying an older 2bdr; I suspect at 6.75% p.a., asking prices are currently a little too high, but not a lot too high.
    bohuma wrote:
    Personally, I will pay a premium for the satisfaction of knowing its my place.
    I won't; the premium for the satisfaction of being able to hammer in a nail is more than offset by the extra time and work involved in administering / repairing your own property and the extra hassle if I need to move city for work. But I'll accept being a little behind for 3-5 years on a mortgage vs. renting, when I know that after that I'll be ahead (at the time when my other living expenses are increasing due to family) and that when I'm ready to retire I'll only have to pay tax and maintenance/heating.

    I also feel I have a moral duty to minimize the tax I pay to the federal government because I disagree with its largest spending item, and owning is a major way to do that, due to the obscene middle-class welfare system that is tax-deductable mortgage interest. No other country I know of does that.
  • I own but in today's market I would rather rent.
  • flux wrote: I own but in today's market I would rather rent.
    -- would rather sell what you've got here, in order to rent here
    -- would rather rent than buy if moving here now
    -- would rather rent here now than buy somewhere else
    -- would rather own/let somewhere else and rent here
    -- would rather rent somewhere else and own/let here
  • this may be unrelated but....

    i hope NYC turns into the late 70's again and i can get an apartment in the village to myself for $150 a month.
  • The late 70s was also a time of high inflation. When the $700 billion bailout plan really starts to work, maybe we can look forward to a Zimbabwe-style crossing out of six digits on the banknotes, and you can have your wish.
  • I keep meaning to post this somewhere. but my 1BR is up for rental (if you want to cover my mortgage, whatsit I pay to the co-op board and that pesky HELOC. and let's not forget the slush fund that covers calls to, oh, the plumber.) or for purchase at a nice price. however, mortgages are next to impossible to get. in any case, PM me if you want a cut rate purchase or an under $2k 1BR with *gasp* window seats, A/Cs to measure, new kitchen appliances and a stained glass window! the first and last got me to rent when I originally moved in.
  • doctorj wrote: The late 70s was also a time of high inflation. When the $700 billion bailout plan really starts to work, maybe we can look forward to a Zimbabwe-style crossing out of six digits on the banknotes, and you can have your wish.
    i hope so...!
  • 5 dollars now was roughly 1 dollar during the mid 70's.

    so if 1beds go down to 500 bucks a month its time to bunker up.
  • This is a great tool from NY Times to help you decide Rent VS Buy:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/business/2007_BUYRENT_GRAPHIC.html
  • Gas Zappers wrote: This is a great tool from NY Times to help you decide Rent VS Buy:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/business/2007_BUYRENT_GRAPHIC.html
    This is great. At first it was a little confusing, because the settings are designed for condominiums. To make it work for a co-op apartment, had to set the "property tax" to zero, since for listings for coops I don't see an individual line item for property tax. Then I had to click on "Advanced Settings" for buying, there on the right, and fill in the coop's maintenance charge, which include property tax, in the "Common charges" space. I also had to adjust the ""cost of buying" to match the closing costs a coop, which usually total about $5,000 or $6,000.
  • im not looking to buy and this place isnt in prospect heights but im still curious about why it hasnt rented. Im pretty sure I saw it a few weeks ago for 1650 but now its down to 1500. Its overlooking the park and around 13th street. Pretty insane it hasnt rented.

    http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/fee/950207102.html
  • Santa wrote: im not looking to buy and this place isnt in prospect heights but im still curious about why it hasnt rented. Im pretty sure I saw it a few weeks ago for 1650 but now its down to 1500. Its overlooking the park and around 13th street. Pretty insane it hasnt rented.

    http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/fee/950207102.html
    I used to date a woman who lived in that apartment in 2000. She was subletting it for 750. Hopefully time will continue to move backwards.
  • that exact apartment?

    crazy

    even a drop to 1300 or 1200 would be great for me.
  • Wow! That is a good deal! It is advertised as a one bedroom but it seems that there's a large living room and there's a center foyer looking area that connects the kitchen and the living room, so maybe it not a real one bedroom?
  • only 150 more than Im paying for a worse location
Sign In or Register to comment.