This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Goldstein Sells Out / Atlantic Yards Update (merged) - Page 2 — Brooklynian

Goldstein Sells Out / Atlantic Yards Update (merged)

2»

Comments

  • raulism wrote: The apartment was not his to sell. It was confiscated by the state on March 1, 2010

    Please read Daniel's statement at
    http://dddb.net/php/latestnews_Linked.php?id=2712
    I think that says it all.
  • this topic has become unmoored

    Mod Note: double-posts tech support convo moved here:
    http://brooklynian.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=57023


    let us return to how much sandy annabi was paid

    by bruce ratner for a ridge hill vote



    now that we know what she is

    i just want to know the final price
  • If the good people had won the good fight, Goldstein would have gotten nothing. The fact that he got more $ after all these years? Good for him!
  • he knew from the get go, he would of lost the war, why prolong something everyone knows from recently supreme court cases they are in favor of private enterprises using eminent domain.


    everyone knows mostly when you're the last hold out you get a bigger payday. eminent domains sucks balls, but since they use it. he just play all those fools who believe they could of win against the illegal government seizure for a private company.
  • Bin Laden can have my condo for $1.3 mill, after I pay the outstanding principle on the mortgage that's a cool million in my pocket. I brought 300K to the party so 700K profit in less than four years? I'm a working stiff, no waaay I could say no, to bring that much home after taxes I gotta work for fifteen years and I have a decent job!
  • I'm trying to think of all the things I would do for 3 million....

    the list is mighty long, and includes lots of things I'm committed to.

    (note: my thoughts assume that I wouldn't have to do these things if I didn't get the 3 million, SOMETHING THAT IN GOLDSTEIN'S INSTANCE WASN'T TRUE.)
  • now he could buy a expensive ass town house in prime areas with his condo money.
  • Actually, this brings up an interesting question. What happens to your mortgage when the State declares imminent domain? In this case, they took the property, so I'm assuming the bank takes a bath on the loan but does anyone know?
  • homeowner wrote: Actually, this brings up an interesting question. What happens to your mortgage when the State declares imminent domain? In this case, they took the property, so I'm assuming the bank takes a bath on the loan but does anyone know?
    The bank is first in line to get paid, since they have a first priority lien (at least in the case of a condo building).

    http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-5610294/Eminent-domain-after-Kelo-last.html

    "The power of eminent domain (also known as condemnation) authorizes the government to take private property for a public use. Lenders often have an interest in eminent-domain proceedings. A lender's lien is a property interest within the meaning of condemnation laws. When the mortgaged property is taken by eminent domain, the lender's rights against the land follow the damages award. The lender may have the mortgage debt satisfied out of the award in advance of other creditors of the borrower. Therefore, if the entire property subject to the mortgage is condemned, the lender is entitled to the entire award, or so much of it as is necessary to satisfy the mortgage debt. This right does not accrue until the award is actually paid into court. "
  • Jack Krohn wrote: And the moral of the story is: anyone's principles can be compromised for a price.

    Nice going, Dan. All those years of hard work and in the end you'll be remember simply as a sell-out!

    Good riddance!
    Right, so they can build your beloved stadium that will surely bring jobs, revenue to Brooklyn (yeah to Ratner's pockets maybe). Whatever, this is the biggest boondoggle in NYC's history.
  • warning: the contents of this link might cause you to fall down laughing or may possibly cause involuntary vomiting. we ask that you be seated in the safety position and prepare the repository before clicking this link.
    "Bertha Lewis, ACORN CEO, Not Happy for Daniel Goldstein"



    if the divine mz. lewis only held out longer

    brucey boy might have paid her more



    seems he only paid her half of what he paid danny and his family
  • Karl the Druid wrote:
    warning: the contents of this link might cause you to fall down laughing or may possibly cause involuntary vomiting. we ask that you be seated in the safety position and prepare the repository before clicking this link.
    "Bertha Lewis, ACORN CEO, Not Happy for Daniel Goldstein"



    if the divine mz. lewis only held out longer

    brucey boy might have paid her more



    seems he only paid her half of what he paid danny and his family
    What a disgusting and vile woman.
  • Bertha is a butthead. Was she responsible for the civil rights fall back plan for Goldstein and his family if worst case played out and he was forced from his home after loosing a court battle with RATner? No way just another idealist that says everything is a fight to the death as long as life at stake is not her own. Did acorn even belly up to the table and offer Goldstein some lawyer cash to fight for the rights of everybody ? I think not . If Goldstein was described as an itch acorn would be a full blown rash or worse
  • isn't bertha just nutty
  • Karl the Druid wrote: acorn_clown.jpg

    one can not have a circus without a clown

    http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/04/acorns_bertha_lewis_goes_a_lit.html
    LMAO =D> :clown: =D> :clown: =D> :clown: =D>
  • It's also probably worth mentioning that he probably owes a large chunk of that money to his lawyer(s) and will owe a bunch in taxes, so he's not exactly netting $3 mil. But whatever he is netting, he deserves - he fought the good fight for the good of this neighborhood. He knew he wasn't going to win at this point - why should he walk away with nothing?
  • re: the above link about bertha lewis, aren't you just validating her comment about goldstein and his followers running a smear campaign? look, she's got a different angle on the atlantic yards. i don't agree with her, but she doesn't deserve to have that kind of picture attached to a sensible email about goldstein.
  • Chekhovian wrote: re: the above link about bertha lewis, aren't you just validating her comment about goldstein and his followers running a smear campaign? look, she's got a different angle on the atlantic yards. i don't agree with her, but she doesn't deserve to have that kind of picture attached to a sensible email about goldstein.
    i see

    so that would mean that your post is actually validating mine


    on planet bizarro that might illustrate 'validation'

    in a land where a clown is queen


    but here on earth the idiom for normal folk

    is referred to as

    'giving someone just enough rope...'
  • Chekhovian wrote: re: the above link about bertha lewis, aren't you just validating her comment about goldstein and his followers running a smear campaign? look, she's got a different angle on the atlantic yards. i don't agree with her, but she doesn't deserve to have that kind of picture attached to a sensible email about goldstein.
    Given the chance, DDDb did not kick ACORN when it was down. I'm referring the the right-wing activist who posed as a pimp.

    You have to remember that not only did Bruce Ratner loan/give ACORN $1.5 million last year to help them out, Bertha Lewis is contractually obligated to say nice things about Atlantic Yards. It's in the Memorandum of Understanding she signed a few years ago.

    After Ratner supporters blasted a bullhorn into my daughter's ears last year when she was 9 months old, I am not very sympathetic to her cries of being a victim of a smear campaign. The Ratner supporters literally hurled insults at my 9 month-old daughter.

    I am not going to make silly pictures of Bertha Lewis. I'll let her words speak for herself. But given her financial dependency on Bruce Ratner, I think she has opened herself up to criticism.
  • omg

    if bertha is the official fcr pr machine

    bruce must be hiding under his desk

    curled in the fetal position

    puppetShow.jpg

    [edited: for planet-bizarro-like validation]
  • Jack Krohn, long time no see.

    Well, looks like we're on the verge of finally getting some development of that area, after hoping and longing for it for 50 years, and overcoming the maniacally anti-development community's attempts to block every possible brick that could be laid in that area. I can only hope the remaining excuses are quickly overcome and my lifelong desire to see something actually get built in that area will come to fruition sooner rather than later.

    Some thoughts: Dan Goldstein did not sell out. You can't blame him for taking the money, not at this point, and it's absurd to say this whole struggle was a cynical ploy just to get a payoff. However, his press statement was typical of his obnoxiousness, as it neglected to mention that he'd given up litigation and taking an active role in opposing AY, and disingenuously made it seem like he was still fighting on unchanged. But this sort of fact cherry picking is typical of his gigantic ego and lack of honesty throughout this process. Good riddance, DG.

    Also, I'd just like to point out that there is very little fundamental difference between "affordable housing" and eminent domain. Both use govt intervention to extract wealth from private individuals to the benefit of other private individuals. One of the most hypocritical and bizarre aspects of the AY opposition was that it's largely comprised of socialist-minded leftwingers who across the boards support government power grabs and redistribution of wealth; until, apparently, the govt grabs something of their own.

    In any case I look forward to the new development. It's a shame that the opposition has cost the project such time and money that the architectural merit of the project has had to be sacrificed, and I hope that by some miracle Ratner can find a way to still make the development economically feasible and architecturally interesting at the same time, something that would have been far easier had the project not been endlessly delayed. I predict the generation that grows up with the basketball team and the housing complex in its midst will come to cherish it and will laugh about how their parents thought it was so awful.
  • to simplify the atlantic yards debacle as good v. evil is too easy


    although there are a large cast of character, lawyers, gov officials,

    prospect heights residents, communties groups...

    danny, bruce, marty, bloomberg... etc.

    the use and misuse of eminent domain is the actual star


    but i can't wait to be the audience in this tv movie

    maybe good ole jack will grace us with a cameo appearance
  • I don't think DG had this planned from the start but I have to wonder what he had planned if he had won?
    What would his apartment be worth then?
    Who would pay his legal fees after the courts found for him?
    Who would compensate him for the lost income from putting career on hold to lead DDDB?
    Winning would have been DG's worst nightmare.
  • is there a need to wonder at all?

    conjecture is always convenient



    in this long running tv series

    all must wonder who's feet will be held to the fire

    when nothing in this awkward plan

    will have worked as promised



    all must observe

    and keep the promise makers responsible

    if they are brave enough
  • for all who live here

    they might ask

    '[how did] silence like a cancer grow?'
  • Atlantic Yards Walls

Sign In or Register to comment.