This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

South of EP: The church at Rogers between Carrol and Crown is torn down. Residential on the way - Page 6 — Brooklynian

South of EP: The church at Rogers between Carrol and Crown is torn down. Residential on the way

123468

Comments

  • @Rick656 You're making a presumption about where people would want to live and feel supported.  In placing homeless in shelters, the city goes by the last neighborhood of residence stated on a census.  Many of them happen to have last lived in Crown Heights.   
    True, but who actually gets to live where they want to live in NY? I would like to live in a penthouse overlooking Central Park (or Prospect Park), but I can't afford it so I live in CH, which for the record I love too. Shouldn't those getting free or heavily subsidized housing be asked to make the same sacrifice and perhaps not get to live in their number 1 choice neighborhood?
  • Rick656 said:
    @Rick656 You're making a presumption about where people would want to live and feel supported.  In placing homeless in shelters, the city goes by the last neighborhood of residence stated on a census.  Many of them happen to have last lived in Crown Heights.   
    True, but who actually gets to live where they want to live in NY? I would like to live in a penthouse overlooking Central Park (or Prospect Park), but I can't afford it so I live in CH.
    By this logic, you're actually advocating for further concentration of these services in lower-income neighborhoods, but instead of CH, you're talking Brownsville and East New York
  • I don't think that most of the protesters are coming from the point of view "we hate homeless people and their shelters." I think they are looking at the whole system and seeing that:
    • The neighborhood is gentrifying
    • Gentrification happens when landlords "renovate" units in old buildings and put new, richer people in the apartments
    • Gentrification also happens when developers build large, new apartment complexes on formerly underused land, new, market-rate paying people move in, and retail starts to match their preferences, making it harder for poorer people to depend on their neighborhood to provide for their needs
    • Poorer people can't stay in their apartments because they are either pushed out by the landlord or because they don't earn enough money to pay rising rent
    • Poor people get evicted and go into the shelter system because they can't afford an apartment in their neighborhood
    • Poor people get put in a shelter in their neighborhood
    • That shelter happens to be a big development building that was supposed to house market rate tenants but now houses people priced out of the neighborhood in large result of the forces that caused the new building to come into being
    I think people are understandably pissed about the optics and reality of the fact that the only people who can live in these rapidly gentrifying neighborhoods are: homeowners fro the days gone by; new, rich homeowners; new rich renters paying market prices; rent-stabilized tenants with decent landlords; and recent evictees from the neighborhood who then end up in a shelter.

  • Rick656 said:

    @Rick656 You're making a presumption about where people would want to live and feel supported.  In placing homeless in shelters, the city goes by the last neighborhood of residence stated on a census.  Many of them happen to have last lived in Crown Heights.   
    True, but who actually gets to live where they want to live in NY? I would like to live in a penthouse overlooking Central Park (or Prospect Park), but I can't afford it so I live in CH.

    By this logic, you're actually advocating for further concentration of these services in lower-income neighborhoods, but instead of CH, you're talking Brownsville and East New York
    No. My whole point is that shelters should be evenly and fairly distributed in all neighborhoods. The response to that point was that we can't do that because homeless people want to live near there last known address, which is more likely to have been in CH (not BH). My most recent comment was that, like everyone else, homeless don't get their top choice location and may have to live in what they may consider to be a less desirable location like Brooklyn Heights so that there is equitable distribution of shelters in all neighborhoods, not only in neighborhoods like CH, Brownsville, East NewYork.

  • @crownheightser - all reasonable points, but why are the people getting evicted or who can't afford increased costs in gentrifying neighborhoods ending up in shelters? Why don't they move to a neighborhood they can afford, e.g Brownsville instead of CH? When market rents went up too much in BH I moved to CH. Same thing.
  • @Rick656 -- my sense of the reason why people are moving into shelters rather than moving to cheaper neighborhoods are that rents in even cheaper neighborhoods like ENY and Brownsville and the Bronx are beyond their ability to pay. Rents in the cheaper neighborhoods have gone up a lot, too, compared to the wages of people living their or wishing to relocate there. From what I hear from people who have been evicted or are leaving voluntarily in search of cheaper rents, the rent in ENY or other neighborhoods is about the same or even higher for what they had in CH before the landlord stopped accepting Section 8 or raised the rent or de-regulated the apartment. Lower middle class people who can move to a new apartment on their own are doing it. It is the people working minimum wage jobs, or are suffering unemployment, who end up in shelter after they lose their apartment, and who don't have $2,000 or $3,000 saved up to pay for a first month/last month deposit on a new place. It's expensive to move, and requires savings. 

    I think the problem is all about a mismatch of wages, housing costs, and urban development. All the developers have a rent price in mind that is out of touch with the ability of people able to pay. If that building on Rogers was gonna be charging around $2,000/month for a 2-bedroom, you've got a building that many more people from the neighborhood can afford to live in as regular old tenants; even if it is a stretch that goes a bit beyond the recommend 30% of your income per month to spend on housing. Other developers and landlords see the projected rents on a building like that, build more too suit or start redeveloping their old buildings, and you start start outpacing what peeps can afford to pay. Then you have this vicious cycle of the new building becoming a shelter for the people evicted in the neighborhood, who were evicted partially based on the dream of high rent rolls started by that very building's presence.
  • One could argue that by opening this shelter in a residential building without community "approval" , it is doing a better job than when it puts homeless in kitchen-less and bedroom less hotel rooms.

    30 hotels are presently being used for this purpose.

    http://nypost.com/2017/04/02/these-are-the-30-posh-hotels-where-nyc-places-its-homeless/

    (Not responsible for The Post's slant)
  • DHS reportedly began notifying elected officials on Feb 15th that a shelter would be opened at this location



  • I might be able to stop by the meeting tonight to witness people scream at each other.

    I haven't appeared at one of these in a while, and my teachers told me I had an obligation to be civicly engaged.
  • The Patch author Marc Torrence has a flair for the dramatic. 

    "...they demanded to know why they hadn't been told about a project that could completely transform their neighborhood."  

  • I predict the Associated Supermarket on Nostrand will be one of the few local businesses that will benefit from this change.

    Their price point is pretty low, making the store a good fit for low income families who may be psych'd to have a kitchen in their apartment.

    A big change from where they may have last lived.

    Some of the fast food places on Empire might get a bump as well.
  • Am I interpreting the below quoted statement correctly?  The number of shelters in the CH area will be reduced by 15.

    "Slated to open in May, the city has said 267 Rogers Ave. will be one of four shelter sites operating in the area by year’s end, down from a total of 19 sites open in the beginning of 2017."

    https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20170407/crown-heights/267-rogers-ave-public-meeting-housing-homeless-shelter


  • If the statement is correct, I assume it involves closing scatter site apartments that shelter families.

    It seems silly to focus on the number of such locations. ...focusing on the number of people/families in a given area seems a better metric.
  • @doughmane you are correct, at the initial meeting on Crown St, the city is planning on shutting down shelter sites that are essentially beyond repair and replacing them with separate facilities like this. So, sites in the area like 60 Clarkson (noted hellhole, incredibly corrupt) will be shut down and replaced with fewer but ideally higher quality shelters.
  • I am not sure if this system still exists, but there used to be 2 tiers that families would go through: Tier 1 and Tier 2.

    Tier 1 was places without kitchens (such as hotels) and congregate facilities that had an onsite institutional kitchen.

    Families then graduated from there to facilities with a private kitchen, Tier 2.

    Once a family made it to Tier 2, they usually behaved in ways that prevented them from being sent back to Tier 1.

    I wonder if that system is still in place; These apartments would clearly meet the definition of Tier 2.

    ...brand new and originally intended for market rate tenants.
  • Has there been talk of litigation like the litigation going on for the Bedford Ave site?
  • South Crown Heights does not seem to have a large home owning middle class, like those that characterize the Crown Heights North Preservation Association.

    ...as a result, it lacks the funds and skills to delay the opening.
  • They've started to furnish the third floor of the building, the apartments facing crown street. Some of the rooms have two single beds, others have bunk beds. The beds also have pillows and blankets on them. Looks like they are getting reading for a demo of what it will look like.
  • 132 homeless families living in a quickly constructed drywall building.

    When one includes the kids and the overnight staff, the site might have 425 people in it on a typical night.

    I hope their facilities staff is ready.

    I hope ear plugs are handy because this seems like a combination that would make it hard for me to sleep if I were a resident.
  • I hope they put curtains or blinds up for the homeless families. I would not expect them to be bringing big curtains with them.
  • Sheets are often used as a result.

    Discount stores in the area might get a bump. Shampoo, toilet paper, coloring books, and laundry detergent come to mind.

  • These are families that are transitioning to more permanent housing?  So in other words, they have an income and are ready to be more independent after the stint at this place is done?
  • whynot_31
    edited May 2017
    Um, these are families who are likely to have an income of some kind (service level employment, SSI or disability).

    However, they are unlikely to be able to leave the shelter system without Linc or CityFEPS.


    They are unlikely to posses the skills required to get a job that provides an income sufficient to pay post-2010 NYC rents. 
  • News crew was there last night to do a view of the place. I don't know the station, but talked briefly to the anchor man.
  • Ch11 did a story on a local block association that is trying to get an injunction against it opening.

    http://pix11.com/2017/05/09/block-association-members-in-crown-heights-fight-against-homeless-shelter-opening/
  • Saw some blinds going up today. Yay. Does anyone know what is happening to the 20% of tenants who will be leaseholders via the affordable housing lottery process? When do they move in?
Sign In or Register to comment.