Whats the big deal about Aunt Suzies?

Semantics. I said "characterized as" not "refered to as." It is clearly possible to characterize someone as a snob without using the word snob, and it has been done multiple times in this thread.

Carnivore wrote: Semantics. I said "characterized as" not "refered to as." It is clearly possible to characterize someone as a snob without using the word snob, and it has been done multiple times in this thread.

so lemme see if i got this straight,
no one specifically mentioned you , no one specifically used the word snob.
no one specifically characterized any indivdual as a snob.

even if they had,
that specifically has nothing to with your opinion of the restuarant.

Yet you restated your opinion again.
ostensibly because you need to once again clarify youre opinion
because you felt attacked yes ?

i call bullshit.
youre bashing.

How 'bouts I bash you both? With a meaty drumstick. It'll be fun!

Anastasia Beaverhausen wrote: How 'bouts I bash you both? With a meaty drumstick. It'll be fun!

sorry, the wife still wont let me date.

No no no, Carny would prefer you beat him with some thick cut bacon, maybe hickory smoked. But Mrs.C is probably more knowledgeable about this stuff

Fucking prudes.

To stay on topic, I've never eaten Aunt Suzie's but I can pretty much guarantee that they make shitty sauce better than I do.

Garfunky wrote: [quote=Carnivore]Semantics. I said "characterized as" not "refered to as." It is clearly possible to characterize someone as a snob without using the word snob, and it has been done multiple times in this thread.

so lemme see if i got this straight,
no one specifically mentioned you , no one specifically used the word snob.
no one specifically characterized any indivdual as a snob.

even if they had,
that specifically has nothing to with your opinion of the restuarant.

Yet you restated your opinion again.
ostensibly because you need to once again clarify youre opinion
because you felt attacked yes ?

i call bullshit.
youre bashing.
No, incorrect. I call bullshit.

I didn't "restate my opinion." Raw suggested that anyone who doesn't like the place must be expecting food like one would get in Italy, or food that one would expect to pay $82 for, which is ridiculous.

What motive would I or anyone else have for "bashing" the place? You're the one who keeps repeating himself by trying to dismiss anyone who disagrees with you as having some mysterious grudge.

You actually enjoy eating there? Cool. Keep going there. No one here is hoping the restaurant fails.

I'm locking this to give everyone a chance to cool off.