This site is closed to new comments and posts.

Notice: This site uses cookies to function.
If you are not comfortable with cookies then please don't browse this website.

Rich kids losing stuff to wealth redistribution. OWS rich kids get jacked. - Page 2 — Brooklynian

Rich kids losing stuff to wealth redistribution. OWS rich kids get jacked.

2»

Comments

  • This reminds me my friend. We both grew up poor. lesson he learn was He gives everything his kid wants. he lets kid choose restaurants to eat at and would fling food and wouldn't bother eating what he ordered. he also buys him all the toys the kid wants. Simply because he didn't have those things when he was a kid.

    reason I stop eating out with him is I can't stand his spoil son. I hope his new daughter would be less spoiled. Which reminds me I should go get her something and soon. she was like born a week ago. I should get off my fat ass and visit the kid.

  • armchair_warrior said:

    if they were street smart and grew up poor they would of watch their stuff and watch everyone carefully and see who the thieves are.

    Regardless of whether they are street smart or poor, they have one bizarre thing in common: They think sleeping outside is a good way to change the world.

  • I disagree if they work in a restaurant and know how hard it is for a working class people, they'll look at people differently and value of the dollar. and know freaking work ethnic. not some self entitled prick.

  • armchair_warrior said:

    I disagree if they work in a restaurant and know how hard it is for a working class people, they'll look at people differently.

    I think respect for others is best taught by the parents, starting at a very early age. Restaurant jobs aren't going to be enough.

  • off course respect should be taught by the parents without saying, but working for something teaches alot of things not just respect.

  • Also damn Stacey :p that's alot of damn kids for American's your parent's had.

  • armchair_warrior said:

    Also damn Stacey :p that's alot of damn kids for American's your parent's had.

    LOL my mother always said she couldn't afford a TV or heat in the winter (we were all born in the summer months ;) ).

  • oh boy LOL. anyone is a black out baby or something too?

  • Besides a lack of infrastructure, leadership, ideology and achievable goals (discussed at length in a different thread) I think one of the biggest liabilities OWS has is that it will be dismissed by most of America if it does not find a way to involve more poor, minority people.

    Whether it is deserved or not, the current image of OWS one of young white people who are disappointed that things are not working out better for them, and that they do not have a larger voice in society.

    When OWS pays attention to minority mothers of two who live in the South Bronx who have never earned more than $10 an hour in their lives, I'll give them credit for paying attention to the countries most pressing problems.

    ...until then, such credit goes to Mr. West and his Poverty Tour. They are successfully merging idealism with actionable goals and policies.

  • whynot_31 said:

    While some experiences do not put kids in "harms way", they are equally pointless. For example, I do not think a upper-middle class, college bound, 17 year old learns anything from working at McDonalds. Nor, does the individual need the money.

    But an upper-class 17 yr old would learn the value of hard work and a dollar if his/her parents said "Now that you have a job, I'm not going to give you any additional spending money. You'll have to learn to budget for what you want versus what you earn." But the reality is that few wealthy parents think that way, so minimum wage jobs become superfluous.

    And its not impossible for wealthy parents to teach their kids this lesson. I happen to know a family where both parents were wall street bankers. When the two kids reached junior high school age, the parents told them that they would get a sizeable allowance each week ($100). However, the parents were no longer going to take on any responsibility for any of the kids personal purchases including clothing or shoes. If the kids wanted anything, they had to purchase it themselves. The mother told me it forced the kids to think long and hard about trade-offs (IPod vs. designer handbag vs. sweater) and that the parents very rarely had to kick in for extras except in extreme circumstances. Unfortunately, parents like that are the exception and not the rule.

  • I've always liked the analogy that compares money to alcohol.

    Basically, it argues that kids who did not learn to drink responsibly with their parents and extended family end up pukeing thru their freshman year of college.

    Likewise, those that have never had money before, borrow lots of money on credit cards and in student aid despite being liberal arts majors.

    Some borrow and puke their entire lives, and try to blame it on their permissive upbringing. Sometimes it is fun to view them as mere 20 somethings ....Union Square is sometimes a good place to spot them.

Sign In or Register to comment.